NATURE JEWISH RITUAL MURDER

CHAPTER IVhttp://www.radioislam.org/judaism/ritual.htm


MOTIVE & NATURE OF
JEWISH RITUAL MURDER


THE motive of Ritual Murder of Christians by Jews is almost certainly hate. It is in fact the same motive that Disraeli admitted to be the cause of revolutionary activities against Gentile governments; to use his words (from Life of Lord George Bentinck, 1852):

"The people of God co-operate with atheists -- the most skillful accumulators of property ally themselves with Communists; the peculiar and chosen Race touch the hand of all the scum and low castes of Europe -- and all this because they wish to destroy that ungrateful Christendom which owes to them even its name, and whose tyranny they can no longer endure."

Hatred of Christianity is a tradition among the Jews. It must be remembered that the Hymn of Hate which was debited to the Germans during the war was actually written by the Jew Lissauer.

One of the principal Jewish feast-days is that of Purim. This feast is an orgy of hate against Haman, the story of whom is found in the Book of Esther of the Old Testament. The story, which is probably a myth, is that Xerxes, King of Persia, became enamored of a Jewess, Esther, and made her Queen in place of his rightful wife. Haman, the King's sister, complained to him of the conduct of the Jews who, he said did not keep the laws, and obtained from the King an order to slay them. Esther pleaded with the King and prevailed upon him to summon Haman to a banquet. There, Queen Esther further prevailed upon the King to spare the Jews and hang Haman on a gallows prepared for the execution of her guardian. Instead of the Jews being destroyed, their enemies were slaughtered, including Haman's ten sons, who were hanged.

This feast is often celebrated by an exhibition of gluttony, intoxication, and curses on the memory of Haman; and even to this day in London, the Jewish bakers make cakes in the shape of human ears which are eaten by the Jews on this day, and are called " Haman's Ears," revealing once again the inherent hate and barbarism of the Jew in our midst.

The two principal feast-days associated with Ritual Murder have been (1) Purim, and (2) Passover, the latter at Easter and the former about one month before it. When a Ritual Murder occurred at Purim, it was usually that of an adult Christian who was murdered for his blood; it is said that the blood was dried and the powder mixed into triangular cakes for eating; it is possible that the dried blood of a Purim murder might sometimes be used for the following Passover. Note; It is around these two Jewish holidays, the disappearance of children in America reach their highest levels. Russia, too, has the same problem. There was even a famous case during 1992, of a ritual killing of a Russian Orthodox Priest. Only Pravda and the New York Post reported it. The Jewish hate group, the ADL, even lobbied the President of the United States to put pressure on American News papers to not report the story, all but one did as asked.

When a Ritual Murder was done at Passover, it was usually that of a child under seven years old, as perfect a specimen as possible, who was not only bled white, but crucified, sometimes circumcised and crowned with thorns, tortured, beaten, stabbed, and sometimes finished off by wounding in the side in imitation of the murder of Christ. The blood taken from the child was mixed either in the powdered state or otherwise into the Passover bread.

Another festival at which it is thought that Ritual Murder has sometimes been indulged in is Chanucah, which occurs in December, commemorating the recovery of Jerusalem under the Maccabees in B.C. 165.

Examples of Purim murders are those of Damascus, Rhodes, Xanten Polna, Gladbeck and Paderborn.

Although hate is the principal motive, superstitious traditions are also involved, one being the association of blood-sacrifices with the idea of atonement; some Jews have confessed that Jewry cannot be saved or return to Zion unless every year the blood of a Christian is obtained for the purpose of ritual consumption.


Political murders, such as the Jewish murder of the Tsar and his family and of other Russians, have sometimes been accompanied by features suggestive of ritual, but I do not wish to complicate this book by guessing at the meaning of signs left symbolically by the murderers. Note: The murders of Palestinians, Lebanese, Syrian and Egyptian solders, are also ritual in nature.



CHAPTER V


A RELIC OF THE DAYS OF WITCHCRAFT
AND BLACK MAGIC





ON 6th May, 1912, The (London) Times published a letter, signed by many men of authority, protesting against what they called the revival of "the hideous charge of Ritual Murder" which was being brought against a Jew at Kiev. "The Blood Accusation," they said, "is a relic of the days of Witchcraft and Black Magic."

Unfortunately for the signatories of this letter, who numbered among them the Archbishops of Canterbury, York and Armagh, the Cardinal Archbishop of Westminster, Bishops galore, Dukes, Earls, Justices, Masters of Colleges and Editors, of that period, the Blood Accusation has nothing medieval about it at all; it was more rife in the 19th century than it was in medieval times!

Unfortunately also, Black Magic is in the same category. It is not medieval either; there never was a wider cult of Black Magic than there is in the year of Our Lord 1938!

How extraordinary it is that influential men can be induced to sign such a statement as I have quoted! And how strange it is that, where Jewish interests are at stake, these same influential Christian men will see nothing improper in attempting to prejudice the course of the criminal trial of the Jew Beiliss at Kiev, a course which they would never pursue in any other cause!

Let us confound the signatories of The Times letter out of the mouths of Jews themselves. The Jewish Encyclopedia, 1903, Vol. III, pp. 266-7, gives a list of Accusations of Ritual Murder made against the Jews through the centuries; 122 cases are listed in chronological order, and no less than 39 of them were made in the 19th century! There were far more than double the number of Blood Accusations made in the 19th century than in any previous century, according to this authoritative Jewish list.

Let us examine the list of Ritual Murder Accusations made by a converted Jew, Cesare Algranati, in 1913, and published in Cahiers Romains; here are listed 101 accusations, of which 28 were made in the 19th century and only 73 for all the eight preceding centuries! Even the Jew Roth gives the argument away, for he says (p. 16 of his Ritual Murder Libel and the Jew, 1935), "The nineteenth century proved little less credulous than those which preceded it."

"Anti-semitic" authors' lists of Blood Accusations agree in this respect with the lists made by Jews; Der Sturmer, the paper of Julius Streicher, in a special Ritual Murder issue published in 1934, shows that in the 19th century 32 charges of ritual murder were made, which is ten more than in any other century in European history recorded by it.

The fact that the charges increase in number as the age becomes more and more enlightened is particularly significant, because the Jewish Money Power and its silencing activities are more developed than ever before and might have been expected to reduce the number of charges.

Sufficient has now been said to expose the absurdity of any attempt to consign the Blood Accusation to any medieval limbo.


It lives today; I may say with the great Sir Richard Burton (The Jew, the Gypsy and El Islam, 1898, P. 129): "At any rate, sufficient has been advanced in these pages to open the eyes of the student and the ethnographer; it will stand on record until Elijah."






Note: By the year of 2000, we have seen the mass Jewish murder of of over 1 million Palestinians, over 50 thousand Lebanese, over 100 million Christians under the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, the lose of over 60 million people during the Jewish started World War Two, the lose over 17 million non-Jews in World War one, and the financing of death in Mexico, (Castro is a Jew) Cuba, Central America, South America and Africa, in the untold millions, and the systematic destruction of the German people. What do the Talmudic Jews have in stor for the word in the 21st century ?



CHAPTER VI


COULDN'T HAPPEN NOW?


(YES !)





THIS argument, "It couldn't happen now," seems quite good enough for a lot of people when it is applied to the matter of Jewish Ritual Murder. It is, perhaps, comforting to the democratic mind to think that "Progress" ensures that such an evil practice, even if it occurred in unenlightened days, could not have survived to-day.

I wish I could see any comfort in this argument, but I don't. There are no facts to support it.

That the European peoples have progressed I do-not deny; but I do not think there is any evidence to show any like progress among Jews.

Compare the following two happenings, noting the dates:

A.D. 117. From the account of Dio (Cassius in 78th Book of his history Chapter 32:

"Then the Jews in Cyrene (on the modern Tripoli coast of North Africa) choosing as their leader one Andreas, slew the Romans and Greeks, and devoured their bodies, drank the blood, clothed themselves in the flayed skins, and sawed many in half from the head downwards; some they threw to wild beasts and others were compelled to fight in single combat, so that in all 220,000 were killed. In Egypt they did many similar things, also its Cyprus, led by one of them named Artemion; and there another 40,000 were slain."

A.D. 1936. From Daily Mail, 17th September (describing the horrors of the Red Revolution in Spain):

"Baena (Cordoba Province): Ninety-one assassinations, mostly by shooting, hatchet blows, or strangling. Others were burned alive. Two nuns who had been dragged from the convent of the Mother of God, had their religious medals with the figure of the Virgin, nailed into the sockets of their eyes.

"La Campana (Seville): Reds, led by a woman, Concepcion Velarde Caraballo, who either killed or was responsible for killing 11 persons in prison. The prisoners were fired on until they fell, covered with petrol, and set on fire. Some were still writhing in the flames when the city was entered.

"Lore del Rio (Seville): 138 assassinated. They were dragged to the cemetery, lined up, and shot in the legs, being buried alive as they fell in a trench. When the town was entered hands could still be seen writhing above the ground."

I cannot see much difference in outlook between the Jewish devils responsible for both these massacres, even though there are 15 centuries between them!

In view of that, why boggle at the idea of Jewish Ritual Murder still surviving?

Why make such a fuss when Jews are charged with the practice of Ritual Murder? Others are known to have practiced it until 1850, and, if left to themselves, would doubtless have maintained the custom.

In India, from 10,000 to 50,000 murders were perpetrated every year by a religious body known as the Thugs. They used to worship Kali, the Hindu goddess of destruction. Their custom was to club together, generally as travellers, when they would slowly gain the confidence of some innocent person, and at a given signal, would strangle him in a prescribed manner, which they regarded as a religious duty; then they would rob him if he had anything to be robbed of, and bury the body with such skill as to leave no trace. The Thugs actually received the protection of some of the native princes and chiefs who were thoroughly frightened of their power as a secret religious sect. How this reminds us of the attitude of the influential men in this country who adopt the same view of Masonry and Jewry!

Then the British Government decided the thing must stop. After many years of investigation, Sir W. H. Sleeman stamped out the Thug sect, and no Thuggee murders are on record since 1850. He found that Thuggee was hereditary among male members of a family, and he achieved his object by confining in segregation for life all male members of Thug families.

Now my point is that Thuggee happened; and happened in the 19th century until the British put an end to it under Sleeman. It was a long time before the British administration learned of the existence of Thuggee, so carefully was it concealed; another analogy with Jewish Ritual Murder! "It couldn't happen now." Why not?

And on 13th September, 1937, a telegram was sent to The Times from Delhi reporting the sacrifice of a 17-year-old youth to propitiate the rain-god, in Sirmoor State. The youth was led through the village of Gunpur by a crowd of people headed by a priest and the village headman, and beheaded on a special altar to the accompaniment of devotional songs. The head was found by the police at the foot of the deity in the village temple.

As British rule over India relaxes, Thuggee and other human sacrifices will re-appear. Note: It did.

"It couldn't happen now." Why not, again?

Here is an extract from Magick by the "Master Therion", published in 1929 by the Lecram Press, 26 Rue d'Hautpool, Paris, pp. 94-5:

". . . it was the theory of the ancient magicians that any living being is a storehouse of energy varying in quantity according to the size and health of the animal, and in quality according to its mental and moral character. At the death of the animal this energy is liberated suddenly. The animal should therefore be killed within the Circle, or Triangle, as the case may be, so that its energy cannot escape.... For the highest spiritual working one must accordingly choose that victim which contains the greatest and purest force. A male child of perfect innocence and high intelligence is the most satisfactory and suitable Note: This is why most abortion clinics are Jewish, they are sacrificing babies.

A footnote on p. 95 says "(4) It appears from the Magical Records of Frater Perdurabo that he made this particular sacrifice on an average about 150 times every year between 1912 e.v. and 1928 e.v."

This footnote refers to the last sentence in the paragraph quoted above.

"It couldn't happen now." Why not, in the Devil's name?

Sir Richard Burton show us that the disappearance of children at Passover was talked of in Rome and in the other towns of Italy throughout the early part of the 19th century when efficient policing was unknown, as also throughout the century at Smyrna and other places in the Levant and in Turkey.

It couldn't happen now? But the Jewish method of cattle slaughter happens now and is specially exempted from the objects of the Slaughter of Animals Act, 1933, which Act orders that all cattle for Gentile food must be stunned with a mechanically-operated instrument before the throat is cut. The Jewish method is cutting the throat from ear to ear without any previous stunning. It has been condemned by a Government Commission held in 1904 as failing in rapidity, freedom from unnecessary pain and instantaneous loss of sensibility. Yet it "happens now" and is protected in this our England, by an English Law, and remains unattacked by the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. Note: The Talmud states that non-Jews are like cattle.Why couldn't it happen now?

To this day, we learn from Jewish sources (B'nai B'rith Messenger, California, 3rd April, 1936) that the Samaritans, an unorthodox Jewish sect who keep Passover by solar computation, indulge in bloody sacrifices of animals on that feast-day; an account is given of a visit to the scene of sacrifice on Mount Gerizim in the 20th century, and these word, are used:

"I have heard the wild, primitive scream of triumph as the knife is withdrawn from the neck of the lamb of sacrifice." Note: Again, the Talmud equates non-Jews with animals.

Here is a paragraph from a periodical which shall be unnamed, of 1936, showing that the urge to the "Mysteries" is not dead:

"The sophisticated Pharisee of the 20th century unceasingly gives thanks that he has outgrown the fables and rituals of the Ancients. The worldly-wise man loves the evident and is exasperated by that which is not evident. Plutocrat and proletarian alike regard themselves as victimized by that person whose words or actions they do not understand. We love the obvious because it flatters us, and hate the mysterious because it damns our intelligence with faint praise. Riddles are irksome. The modern cry is for facts. Yet, with facts for his fetish, the modernist is more foolish than his forebears. Decrying superstition, he is most superstitious; rejecting fancies, he is the fanciful product of a fictitious age. The modern world is bored with its own importance; life itself has become a botheration. Suffering from chronic ennui, how can a world ever become interested in anything but itself? Smothered in their self-complacency, these all-sufficient ones ask for facts. But what facts are there that fools can understand? How can the helpless superficial grasp the hopelessly profound, for are not realities reserved for the wise?"






Alongside this clotted nonsense was a picture of a ritual murder, with the victim crucified, below it, a portrait of the author, an obvious Jew.I take it that- "it would happen now" if this Jew had his way!






And it did !!! The Son of Sam ritual killing in New York, were ritualistic murders, by Jews. As it turns out, there were many people involved with these crimes, some of whom were, and still are, members of the New York City police department. No attempt by Law Enforcement, to find out the identifies of these cops has taken place.











stardefinibusterrae (1 secondo fa)


Rimuovi | Spam


@ ComunitaEbraicaRoma - the ignorant think, that: the King of Israel must govern his people: "No! Nothing is further from the truth!" The Jews do not need to be ruled! But few know that: only the King of Israel has the authority to say: "Talmud and Kabbalah: are Satanism: whoever: following these doctrines? Is out of the Kingdom of God!" .. So few people know: that the King of Israel: has fundamentally: an theological task: that is, freeing the Jewish people from its curse: it is: the death instinct: and instinct of self-destruction!








stardefinibusterrae (1 minuto fa)


Rimuovi | Spam


@ComunitaEbraicaRoma - gli ignoranti pensano: che: il Re di Israele deve governare il suo popolo: "no! niente è di più falso!" Gli ebrei non hanno bisogno di essere governati! Ma, pochi sanno che: soltanto il Re di Israele ha la autorità per dire: "talmud e cabbala: sono il satanismo: chiunque: segue queste dottrine? è fuori del Regno di Dio!".. Così pochi sanno: che il Re di Israele ha fondamentalmente compiti teologici: cioè liberare il popolo ebraico dalla sua maledizione: che è: istinto di morte: ed istinto di autodistruzione!






stardefinibusterrae (22 ore fa)


Rimuovi | Spam


Ave Maria, gratia plena,

Dominus tecum,

benedicta tu in mulieribus,

et benedictus fructus ventris tui Iesus.

Sancta Maria mater Dei,

ora pro nobis peccatoribus,

nunc, et in hora mortis nostrae.

Amen






stardefinibusterrae (1 giorno fa)


Rimuovi | Spam


@ComunitaEbraicaRoma -- Maria di Nazareth: la madre di Gesù di Betlemme: è una ragazza ebrea: come tutte! ma, come prima cristiana? Lei è una primizia: di quello, che, ogni cristiano(se ne sarà degno): potrebbe diventare: cioè: essere vero figlio di Dio(per adozione): e non solo: simbolicamente: come gli ebrei: giustamente: attribuiscono a se stessi! per avere ricevuto: in potenza: tutti i cristiani: soltanto: in Cristo: la stessa: Natura Divina di Dio: come: infatti, è già ora vero: per me: in fede! Non esiste: e non è mai esistito: quindi: un culto di adorazione per Maria! Tutte le statue: e le icone: fatte in suo onore? sono soltanto: le fotografie: che ognuno: ha in casa: per onorare la sua mamma! Perché lei è: spiritualmente: la madre e la sorella: di tutti i cristiani! ogni altra affermazione? o illazione? sono solo calunnie!


http://www.radioislam.org/judaism/ritual.htm







stardefinibusterrae (3 mesi fa)


Rimuovi | Spam


@ AIPAC -> now? Keep away those that can do the gay, from ​the transmitter: with the trasmitter of the "WIND", for my USB: thanks!

God bless you all, good night!




@ AIPAC -> adesso? tu puoi fare allontare quei gay: che si sono messi a disturbare: il trasmettitore della "WIND", grazie!

Dio vi benedica tutti: buona notte!






stardefinibusterrae (3 mesi fa)


Rimuovi | Spam


@ AIPAC -> then, the God's plan: to see allies: Judaism and Christianity? Of course, not a project today! it went bankrupt: in these 2000 years, only, because of your fathers! How many sufferings could have been avoided? ... sic ... How better could have been, the world today? But, I have news for you: "it does not matter how many horses or dogs: you want to fuck" for profaning all, the whole human race through your control of the media: how, through control: of any other monopoly. but you will not be able to defeat Christianity in this way! you leave Satan, and returns to God, my love: at last!






stardefinibusterrae (3 mesi fa)


Rimuovi | Spam


@ AIPAC -> allora, il progetto di Dio: di vedere alleati: l'ebraismo ed il cristianesimo? Certo, non è un progetto: di oggi! esso, è andato fallito: in questi 2000 anni, unicamente, per colpa dei tuoi padri! Quante sofferenze: si sarebbero potute evitare? ... sic ... Come migliore, avrebbe potuto essere, il mondo, oggi? Ma, io ho una notizia per te: "non ha nessuna importanza, quanti cavalli o cani: tu ti vuoi fottere": profanando tutto il genere umano: attraverso il tuo controllo dei MEDIA: come, attraverso il controllo: di ogni altro monopolio. ma, tu non riuscirai a sconfiggere il cristianesimo: in questo modo! Lascia satana, e torna a Dio: mio amore: finalmente!






stardefinibusterrae (3 mesi fa)


Rimuovi | Spam


@ AIPAC -> [?what is the truth of the story?] You did kill Jesus, then you have killed Stephen and James, etc. .. all for "blasphemy", "apostasy", then what difference there is between you and the Muslims? Only that, you are better educated, but also: 1. most thieves (seigniorage banking), 2. most criminal (murder of Kennedy), and 3. most racist (Talmud): of the Muslims: of course! Then, since in Unius Rei: there is no partiality? Then, like: I have to kill all the Muslims of the Sharia? Then, of course, I must kill, too, all of you! it is because I am a man: mild? So, I do make, at the your WWnuclear 3 °, and then see who the Holy Spirit will do survive in a: hell nuclear inferno! Since die? is much better, which, being on a planet with you!






stardefinibusterrae (3 mesi fa)


Rimuovi | Spam


@AIPAC - [quale è la verità della storia?] Voi avete fatto uccidere Gesù: poi avete ucciso Stefano e Giacomo, ecc.. tutto per "blasfemia"; "apostasia"; che differenza allora, c'è tra voi e i musulmani? Soltanto, che, voi siete più istruiti: ma, anche: 1. più ladri, 2. più criminali; e 3. più razzisti: dei musulmani: ovviamente! Allora, poiché in Unius Rei: non c'è parzialità? Allora, come io devo sterminare tutti i musulmani della Sharia? Poi, certamente io devo sterminare anche tutti voi! è poiché io sono un uomo mite? allora io vi abbandono alla vostra amata 3°WWnuclear, e poi vediamo, chi lo Spirito Santo farà sopravvivere: in quell'inferno nucleare! Poiché morire? è molto meglio che stare in un pianeta insieme a voi!


















The Jewish Israel Lobby in the U.S.




click





One Nation, Under Israel by Andrew Hurley, 1999.
Reviewed by Richard Curtiss




AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee) is Israel's main lobby in the U.S. There are about 126 other political action committees (PAC), listed under deceptive names to hide their actual purpose, that can be mobilized at any time to rain money on any congressman ousting his disobedient opponent who dared criticize any aspect of U.S.-Israeli relationship. No wonder AIPAC is referred to on the Capitol Hill as "The Lobby". Many congressmen (now all ex's), such as the late Fullbright, Findley, and Percy, felt its power when daring to mildly criticize U.S.-Israeli relationship. Such criticism would also induce the wrath of the numerous pro-Israel columnists around the nation's major newspapers, such the New York Times' Safire, A.M. Rosenthal and the more subtle Thomas Friedman, the Washington Post's Charles Krauthammer and George Will, the Boston Globe's Jeff Jacoby, or the New Republic's Martin Peretz and Steven Emerson.

Those who are in line with AIPAC's will --commonly seen prostituting themselves and their country for the sake of Jewish vote-- such as Gephardt, Forbes, Helms, Gilman, D'Amato, Moynihan, Harkin, Levin, Specter, Lieberman and Gingrich, are generously rewarded. All Netanyahu (or any Israeli leader) has to do is make up a catchy phrase, regardless of how false or out-of-context it may be, e.g. "Arafat is not keeping his promise of locking terrorists up" or that "the Palestinian Authority has not changed their charter which calls for Israel's destruction". Immediately following that the whole flock of these pro-Israel congressmen are seen parroting in unison the same statements over and over until a new is devised. It is sad to see the many policy makers of today having their own political gains in mind, rather than the good of their country and the world.





The Israel Lobby
By John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt


A Look at The 'Powerful Jewish Lobby'
By Mark Weber


Pat Buchanan: In His Own Words On American Jews and the Pro-Israel Lobby
A collection of quotes allegedly made by the US politician Pat Buchanan
and taken from the Zionist-Jewish organization ADL:s Homepage


AIPAC´s influence on US politics
From the Jewish Tribal Review homepage on Jews and Government part 1.


Them or Us - AIPAC on Trial
By James Petras


Entrenched Hypocrisy - Hillary Clinton, AIPAC and Iran
By Joshua Frank


Former U.S. congressman James Traficant on the power of the Jewish lobby
Includes a videoclip from his TV-appearance on Greta van Sustern´s show, Fox News, September 10th 2009


Pro-Israel Lobby Sways U.S. Policy
about AIPAC - "American Israel Public Affairs Committee", (New York Times Service 07/06/1987)


Spy Probe Scans Neocon-Israel Ties
By Jim Lobe


Lobby´s influence on Israeli policy due to skill in Congress
New York Times about AIPAC´s influence


AIPAC - The No 1 Lobby Group in Washington


The Israeli-Zionist Lobby in the United States
By French intellectual and politician Roger Garaudy


Can Obama escape the Domination of AIPAC and the American Jewish/Zionist Israeli lobby?
By Debbie Menon


A Strange Kind of Freedom
Robert Fisk: on the Jewish lobby in USA


AIPAC Trains US Student Pro-Israel Activists
From Cleveland Jewish News.com


Restrictions on Rice speech worry Israeli lobbying group
Article from The Chicago Tribune


Mahatma Gandhi and the pro-Israeli lobby in the US
By Robi Chakravorti. On the forced resignation of Arun Gandhi and the Jewish lobby vis-a-vis Mahatma Gandhi.

AIPAC Ranked #2 for Second Consecutive Year in FORTUNE Magazine's "Power 25" (AIPAC WebSite 11/23/1998)


AIPAC Ranked 4th
(Fortune Magazine)


Gingrich Prostration Caps Month of Congressional Prostitution for Pro-Israel Votes, Campaign Contributions
By Shirl McArthur (Washington Report 07/1998)


While AIPAC Slept
By Daniel Bloch (Jerusalem Post 10/03/1999). An interesting article from an Israeli right-wing paper, addressing AIPAC's influence and "slips" in service of Israel.


Pro-Israel PAC Donations Soared in Final Months of 1996 Election Cycle
By Richard Curtiss (Washington Report 04/1997) also here (10/1996).


The Pro-Israel Lobby
By Edward Herman (Z Magazine 07/1994)


Labor Accuses AIPAC of Being 'extreme right-wing' group By Nitzan Horowitz (Ha'aretz 08/04/1998). Even Labor thinks that AIPAC is too pro right-wing.


Safire Media Attacks Began When Inman Blocked Israeli Access to U.S. Satellite Intelligence.
Excerpts from transcript of televised news conference by Admiral Bobby Ray Inman in Austin, TX, Jan. 18, 1994 (Washington Report 02/1994). Another article by Richard Curtiss on this issue (Washington Report 02/1994).


The Pro-Israeli Lobby in the US and the Inman Affair
A chapter from Israel Shahak´s book "Open Secrets"


Pro-Israel Lobbies Urging Agenda Inimical to Israel ...
By Neve Gordon (Washington Report 01/1998)


The Israel Lobby in America - Special Report
By Robert Hazo (Washington Report, August 12, 1985, Page 1)


The Jews who Run Clinton's Court
By Avinoam Bar-Yosef (Ma'ariv 09/02/1994)


Demonizing Islamic Revivalism: The Jewish Lobby's Impact on U.S. Foreign Policy
By Dr. Ahmad Yousef & Terry Rauch


Kosher White House
(Middle East Realities 6/16/1997)


Political Overkill
By Joseph Harsch (Christian Science Monitor 08/16/1984)


U.S. Policy-Makers' Voting Record on Israel in 1997-98
By Shirl McArthur (Washington Report 09/1998)


Under Prodding of a Zionist Al Gore Fires a Speech Writer
By Donald Neff (Washington Report 07/1998)


Dear Bill, a call on Bill Clinton from an Israeli peace activist, to toughen up against Netanyahu and "disregard those bought senators"
By Uri Avnery (Ma'ariv 08/24/1998)

The Lobby
By Michael Poulin (Palestine Papers 06/1989)


Israel's Powerful Friends
By George Szamuely (www.antiwar.com 06/2000)


AIPAC President Resigns
By Sheldon L. Richman (Washington Report 12/1992)


Sen. John McCain's Speech to AIPAC - American Israel Public Affairs Committee
June 02, 2008


See also: McCain Addresses AIPAC Annual Policy Conference 2002


Senator Hillary Clinton's Remarks to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC)
February 1, 2007


Colin Powell Kisses Ass At AIPAC
Transcript of Powell´s speech


Al Gore Prostitutes Himself in Front of the Israeli Lobby
Al Gore delivered a speech at the 39th Annual Policy Conference of AIPAC




Other Jewish lobbies






The Israeli-Zionist Lobby in France
By Roger Garaudy, extract from his book The Founding Myths of Israeli Politics


Mitterrand Complained About a "Zionist Lobby"
(Reuters/Ha'aretz 08/27/1999)


The Israel lobby in the United Kingdom
The entire 2009 Wikipedia entry on the subject, naming their most important organizations


Check this link to see Channel 4's "Dispatches" documentary "Inside Britain´s Israel Lobby" aired November 16, 2009.









The Jewish lobby and the Iraq war
Jewish Lobby pushes US to war against Iraq
By David Rogers (Wall Street Journal 01/28/1991)


Israel's Role in the Gulf War
"The Jewish lobbyists in the USA are deeply involved in the propaganda work promoting a war against Iraq." -- Ha'aretz, 01/13/1991


AIPAC Asking Its Members to sign PRO-Sanction Letter
(AIPAC Update 03/14/2000)


AIPAC and the Iraqi opposition
Article published Online by the Israeli Newspaper Ha´aretz



Presently the same Jewish lobby is active for boycott and war against Iran.










Quotes





We, the Jewish people, control America

"Every time we do something you tell me America will do this and will do that . . . I want to tell you something very clear: Don't worry about American pressure on Israel. We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it."

-- Israeli Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon, October 3, 2001.








"I've never seen a president --I don't care who he is-- stand up to them [the Israelis]. It just boggles your mind. They always get what they want. The Israelis know what's going on all the time. I got to the point where I wasn't writing anything down. If the American people understood what grip those people have on our government, they would rise up in arms. Our citizens don't have any idea what goes on."
-- Admiral Thomas Moorer of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. (See Washington Report 12/1999, p.124 quoting from Andrew Hurley's book, "One Nation Under Israel")



"... terrific control the Jews have over the news media and the barrage the Jews have built up on congressmen .... I am very much concerned over the fact that the Jewish influence here is completely dominating the scene and making it almost impossible to get congress to do anything they don't approve of. The Israeli embassy is practically dictating to the congress through influential Jewish people in the country"
-- Sec. of State John Foster Dulles in Feb. 1957 quoted on p.99 of Fallen Pillars by Donald Neff




"The Israeli Prime Minister has a lot more influence over the foreign policy of the United States in the Middle East than he has in his own country."
-- Former Congressman Paul Findley, in his book They Dare to Speak Out, p. 92.

"The Israelis control the policy in the congress and the senate ... somewhere around 80 percent of the senate of the United States is completely in support of Israel -- of anything Israel wants...."
-- Chairman Senator Fullbright, 10/07/1973 on CBS' "Face the Nation".




"We have exhausted our requests. President Clinton has answered all our needs. There has been no American president in history like President Clinton, in his support of Israel and the Jewish people."
-- Shimon Peres (From Washington Report, July 1996, pg. 17)


"President Clinton behaves like an obedient child of Israel and does not know how to say `No.'"
-- Nahum Barnea, Israeli writer (From Washington Report, July 1996, pg. 17)




"There is definitely an anti-Arab bias in America, and I regret it"
-- Peter Jennings cited in Alfred Lilienthal's 1982 Zionist Connections II, p.273, citing Edmund Ghareeb, The American Media and the Palestine Problem, Journal of Palestine Studies, Autumn 1975, Winter 1976.

"The Capitol Hill is an Israeli occupied territory".
-- Patrick Buchanan (St. Louis Dispatch, 10/20/1990).













"I am aware how almost impossible it is in this country to carry out a foreign policy [in the Middle East] not approved by the Jews. [Former Secretary of State George] Marshall and [former Defense Secretary James] Forrestral learned that"
-- Sec. of State John Foster Dulles in Feb. 1957 quoted on p.99 of Fallen Pillars by Donald Neff









"I know I was elected by the votes of American Jews. I owe them my victory. Tell me, is there something I ought to do?"
-- U.S. President John F. Kennedy speaking privately to Ben-Gurion (p.90 A & L Cockburn 1991).








"The little Knesset"

-- Sec. of state James Baker describing pro-Israel Congressmen, quoted in the Web Page of the Zionist Organization of America, which, in turn, quotes the Los Angeles Times (March 7, 1992)








"I do not think I ever had as much pressure and propaganda aimed at the White House as I had in this instance"
-- U.S. President Harry Truman writing in his memoirs about the Zionist pressure to support the partition of Palestine.








"But I believe that Israel has a powerful stranglehold on the American government. They control both members of the House, the House and the Senate. They have us involved in wars in which we have little or no interest.
Our children are coming back in body bags. Our nation is bankrupt over these wars. And if you open your mouth, you get targeted. And if they don't beat you at the poll, they'll put you in prison.

[...]

They're controlling much of our foreign policy. They're influencing much of our domestic policy.
Wolfowitz as undersecretary of defense manipulated President Bush number two back into Iraq. They've pushed definitely, definitely to try to get Bush before he left to move into Iran.
We're conducting the expansionist policy of Israel and everybody's afraid to say it. They control much of the media, they control much of the commerce of the country, and they control powerfully both bodies of the Congress. They own the Congress."
-- Former U.S. congressman James Traficant in Fox News, September 10th 2009.






CHAPTER VII


JEWISH RITUAL MURDER IN ENGLAND BEFORE THE EXPULSION OF 1290





THE first known case happened in 1144; after that, cases cropped up from time to time until the Jews were expelled from the realm by Edward I. The most famous of these cases was that of Little St. Hugh of Lincoln in 1255. I record these cases in chronological order; and I do not deny the possibility of some of them in which details are lacking, being "trumped-up" ones, where death may have been due to causes other than ritual murder and the Jews blamed for it; but the case of St. Hugh, particularly, was juridically decided, and the Close and Patent Rolls of the Realm record definitely cases at London, Winchester and Oxford. There seems no reason to doubt that many cases of ritual murder have been unsuspected and even undiscovered.

1144- Norwich. A twelve-year-old boy was crucified and his side pierced at the Jewish Passover. His body was found in a sack hidden in a tree. A converted Jew, called Theobald of Cambridge, confessed that the Jews took blood every year from a Christian child because they thought that only by so doing could they ever obtain their freedom and return to Palestine, and that it was their custom to draw lots to decide whence the blood was to be supplied; Theobald said that last year the lot fell to Narbonne but in this year to Norwich. The boy was locally beatified and has ever since been known as St. William. The Sheriff, probably bribed, refused to bring the Jews to trial. Note; Modern Jews were never in Palestine.

In J. C. Cox's Norfolk Churches, Vol. II, p. 47, as also in the Victoria Country History of Norfolk, 1906, Vol. II, is an illustration of an old painted rood-screen depicting the Ritual Murder of St. William, the screen itself is in Loddon Church, Norfolk, unless the Power of Jewish Money has had it removed. No one denies this case as a historical event, but the Jews of course say it was not a Ritual Murder. The Jew, C. Roth, in his The Ritual Murder Libel and the Jew (1935) says: "Modern inquirers, after careful examination of the facts, have concluded that the child probably lost consciousness in consequence of a cataleptic fit, and was buried prematurely by his relatives." How these modern inquiries arrived at a conclusion like that after all these years, Mr. Roth does not say; nor is it a compliment to the Church to suggest that its ministers would allow the boy's death to be celebrated as a martyrdom of a saint without having satisfied themselves that wounds on the body confirmed the crucifixion and the piercing of the side. And why the relatives should bury the boy in a sack and then dig it up and hang it in a tree would puzzle even a Jew to explain.

John Foxe's Arts and Monuments of the Church records this ritual murder, as did the Bollandists and other historians. The Prior, William Turbe, who afterwards became Bishop of Norwich, was the leading light in insisting that the crime was one of Jewish Ritual Murder; in the Dictionary of National Biography (edited by a Jew!) it is made clear that his career, quite apart from this Ritual Murder case, is that of a man of great strength of character and moral courage.

1160- Gloucester. The body of a child named Harold was found in the river with the usual wounds of crucifixion. Sometimes wrongly dated 1168. Recorded in Monumenta Germania Historica, Vol. VI (Erfurt Annals); Polychronicon, R. Higdon; Chronicles, R. Grafton, p. 46.

1181- Bury St. Edmunds. A child called Robert was sacrificed at Passover. The child was buried in the church and its presence there was supposed to cause 'miracles.' Authority: Rohrbacher, from the Chronicle of Gervase of Canterbury.

1192- Winchester. A boy crucified. Mentioned in Jewish Encyclopedia as being a false charge. Details lacking.

1232- Winchester. Boy crucified. Details lacking. Mentioned in Hyamson's History of the Jews in England; also in Annals of Winchester; and conclusively in the Close Roll 16, Henry III, membrane 8, 26.6. 1232.

1235- Norwich. In this case, the Jews stole a child and hid him with a view to crucifying him. Haydn's Dictionary of Dates of date 1847, says of this case, "They (the Jews) circumcise and attempt to crucify a child at Norwich; the offenders are condemned in a fine of 20,000 marks." Further authority Huillard Breolles Grande Chronique, III, 86. Also Close Roll, 19 Henry III, m 23.

1244- London. A child's body found unburied in the cemetery of St. Benedict, with ritual cuts. Buried with great pomp in St. Paul's. Authority: Social England, Vol. I, p. 407, edited by H. D. Traill.

1255- Lincoln. A boy called Hugh was kidnapped by the Jews and crucified and tortured in hatred of Jesus Christ. The boy's mother found the body in a well on the premises of a Jew called Joppin or Copinus. This Jew, promised by the judge his life if he confessed, did so, and 91 Jews were arrested; eventually 18 were hanged for the crime. King Henry III himself personally ordered the juridical investigation of the case five weeks after the discovery of the body, and refused to allow mercy to be shown to the Jew Copinus, who was executed. Note; Throwing bodies in wells was common when Jews killed in Russia and Palestine

Hugh was locally beatified, and his tomb may still be seen in Lincoln Cathedral, but the Jewish Money Power has evidently been at work, for between 1910 and 1930, a notice was fixed above the shrine as follows:

"The body of Hugh was given burial in the Cathedral and treated as that of a martyr. When the Minster was repaved, the skeleton of a small child was found beneath the present tombstone. There are many incidents in the story which tend to throw doubt upon it, and the existence of similar stories in England and elsewhere points to their origin in the fanatical hatred of the Jews of the Middle Ages and the common superstition, now wholly discredited, that ritual murder was a factor of Jewish Paschal Rites. Attempts were made as early as the 13th century by the Church to protect the Jews against the hatred of the populace and against this particular accusation."

At a recent visit to Lincoln of the Jewish Historical Society, in 1934, the Mayor, Mr. G. Deer, said to them: "That he (St. Hugh) was done to death by Jews for ritual purposes cannot be other than a libel based upon the prejudices and ignorance of an unenlightened age." The Chancellor on the same occasion said: "It was quite obviously one of the very many cases of slander spread about the Jews from time to time. No doubt, the child died or fell down the well."

These people, Jews and Gentiles, bring no evidence whatever for their statements; it couldn't have happened, they say. Why not?

Was Henry III, weak in character as we know him to have been, ever charged with being an immoral man? Did the judges not examine the body, which was only four weeks dead? Is Haydn's Dictionary of Dates (1847 edition) medieval and superstitious when it said of this case "They (the Jews) crucify a child at Lincoln, for which 18 are hanged"? There are no 'ifs' and 'buts' here! Or does Copinus's confession not tally with that of Theobald, quoted above in the first Norwich case? Copinus said, "For the death of this child, nearly all the Jews in England had come together and every town had sent deputies to assist in the sacrifice."

No one questions the historical facts in this case; but Jews and Judaised Gentiles unite in denying the fact of Ritual Murder.

Strack, in his The Jew and Human Sacrifice, written in defence of the Jews against the Blood Accusation, omits all mention of this famous case, which is the subject of the Prioress's Tale (Canterbury Tales) of Chaucer and is referred to in Marlowe's Jew of Malta. Hyamson's History of the Jews in England devotes the whole of Chapter IX to "Little St. Hugh of Lincoln," showing the importance of the Ritual Murder issue in the Jewish mind today.

The following Close Rolls of the Realm refer to the case of St. Hugh: Henry III, 39, m. 2,7.10 1255; 39, m. 2,14.10.1255; 40, m. 20, 24.ii.. 1255; 40,m.13,13.3.1256; 42, m. 6; 19.6.1258. And the Patent Rolls, Henry III, 40,m.20,26.11.1255; 40,m.19,9.12.1255; 40,27.3.1256; and 40,m.5, 20.8.1256.

1257. London. A child sacrificed. Authority: Cluverius. Epitome Historia, p. 541. Details lacking.

1276. London. Boy crucified. Authority: The Close Roll of the Realm, 4, Edward I, membrane 14, 3.3.1276.

1279. Northampton. A child crucified. Haydn's Dictionary of Dates, 1847, says of this case: "They (the Jews) crucify a child at Northampton for which 50 are drawn at horses' tails and hanged." Further authorities: Reiley, Memorials of London, p. I5; H. Desportes, Le Mystere du Sang.

1290. Oxford. The Patent Roll 18 Edward I, mem. 21, 21st June, 1290, contains an order for the gaol delivery of a Jew, Isaac de Pulet, detained for the murder of a Christian boy at Oxford.

Only one month after this, King Edward issued his decree expelling the Jews from the Kingdom. There is, then, every reason to believe that it was the Oxford murder which proved the last straw in toleration.

The reader will see (p. 20) that it was a similar ritual case which was one of the main stimulants to the King and Queen of Spain to expel professing Jews from that country in 1492.

The Jews, in attempting to escape responsibility for these deaths by Ritual Murder, do not hesitate to impugn the probity of two of the Kings of England, against whose moral character no one else has dared to cast a slur. Here are some examples. From the Jewish Chronicle Supplement, April, 1936, p. 8 (speaking of the Lincoln case in the reign of Henry III):

"Henceforth and especially under the zealously Christian Edward I, the Crown and its officers became almost a worse peril to the Jews than mobs intent on loot and led on by fanatic priests and knightly spendthrifts who had borrowed Jewish money. When 18th century writers of history began to examine the old records in a new sceptical temper, some may be found venturing on such unkind surmises as that the alleged crucifictions of Christian children only seemed to happen when kings were short of money." The foul accusation against men of upright character is repeated by the Jew Hyamson (History of the Jews in England, 1928 edition, p. 21), writes: "it has also been pointed out that the Blood Accusation was as a rule made at a time at which the Royal Treasury needed replenishing."

To deny that the cases of St. William of Norwich and St. Hugh of Lincoln were Jewish Ritual Murders is to accuse certain English Kings, certain English Clergy, and certain English administrators, known to be men of good morals, of murdering and torturing Jews to get their money, after accusing them of horrible crimes. In the case of St. Hugh, the sentence was juridical; in the case of St. William, the mob took the matter into their own hands because the Sheriff would take no action himself.

Whom do you believe the Jews or the English?

"It is difficult to refuse all credit to stories so circumstantial and so frequent." So says Social England concerning Ritual Murders in England Vol. I, p. 407, I893, edited by H. D. Traill.


A significant fact is that Haydn's Dictionary of Dates, at least up to 1847, quoted the Ritual Murders in Norman and Plantagenet England as undisputed facts. In later editions in the sixties, all mention of them is extirpated! We may take it that the Jewish Money Power began to dictate to the Press in England somewhere in the fifties of the last century.



WELL AUTHENTICATED CASES IN EARLY AND MEDIEVAL TIMES
1171 TO 1510






IN this, and subsequent chapters, I place descriptions of cases in chronological order, in which there seems to me to be no reason whatever to dispute the historical accuracy of the facts given.

In this Chapter, I record such cases between 1171 and 1510 inclusive; and I would point out to the reader the great importance of the murder of St. Simon of Trent in 1475 and of the Toledo case in 1490; in fact, should the reader be one of those who approach the subject as unbelievers, I recommend that he should read about these two cases first, and the others after.

The following abbreviations are used in this Chapter among the references to authorities:

Magd. Cent. for Magdeburg Centuries, a Protestant History of the Christian Church compiled at Magdeburg, sixteenth century.

Chron. Hirsaug. for Chronicon Hirsaugiense, a history produced by Abbot J. Trithemius, 1514.

Cosm. Munst. for Sebastian Munster's Cosmographia Universalis, 1544.

Spec. Viva. for Vincent of Beauvais's Speculum Historiale, of 13th century.

1171 Blois, France. At Passover, a Christian child was crucified, his body drained of blood and thrown into the river. A number of Jews were executed. Authority: Monumenta Germania Historica, VI, 520; Magd Cent., 12, C. 14 and 13, C. 14.

1179. Pontoise. The authorities for this case are the Bollandists (Acta, Vol. III, March, 591); Madg. Cent., 23, c. 14; Spec. Vinc, 129, C. 25; and Cosm. Munst., 23, C. 14. A boy named Richard was tortured, crucified and bled white. Philip Augustus's chaplains and historians, Rigord and Guillaume l'Armoricain, attested this case. The body of the boy was taken to the Church of the Holy Innocents in Paris and he was canonised as St. Richard.

Under date 1080, Haydn's Dictionary of Dates, 1847, p. 282, says: "Thinking to invoke the divine mercy, at a solemnisation of the Passover, they (the Jews) sacrifice a youth, the son of a rich tradesman at Paris, for which all the criminals are executed and all Jews banished France."

1192. Braisne. Philip Augustus attended to this case personally, and had the criminals burnt. It was a case of the crucifixion of a Christian sold to the Jews by Agnes, Countess of Dreux, who considered him guilty of homicide and theft. Authority: Histoire des Ducs et Comtes de Champagne, IV, 1st part, p. 72, Paris, 1865) by A. de Jubainville; Sped. Vinc., 129, c. 25; Gaguin. L. 6, De Francis; Magd. Cenf., 12, C. 14, col. 1670.

1235. Fulda, Hesse-Nassau. Five children murdered; Jews confessed under torture, but said the blood was wanted for healing purposes. Frederick II exonerated the Jews from suspicion, but the Crusaders had already dealt with a number by putting them to death. Frederick II called together a number of converted Jews, who denied the existence of Jewish ritual murder. But Frederick's bias is evident in his own words when, in publishing his decision, he gives his objects in calling these people together, "although our conscience regarded the innocence of the aforesaid Jews adequately proved on the ground of several writings." Had Frederick II lived today, he would have relied little upon religious literature in deciding whether Jewish Ritual Murder exists or not. Authority: Chron. Hirsaug., and Magd. Cent., 13, C. 24.

1247. Valreas, France. Just before Easter, a two-year-old girl's body was found in the town moat with wounds on forehead, hands and feet. Jews confessed under torture that they wanted the blood of the child, but did not say that it was for ceremonial purposes. Pope Innocent IV said that three of the Jews were executed without confessing, but the Jewish Encyclopedia, 1903, Vol. III, p. 261, says they confessed.

1250. Saragossa. A boy crucified, afterwards canonized as St. Dominiculus. Pius VII, 24th Nov., 1805, confirmed a decree of the Congregation of Rites of 31st August, according this canonization.

1261. Pforzheim, Baden. An old woman sold a seven-year-old girl to the Jews, who bled her, strangled her and threw the body into the river. The old woman was convicted on the evidence of her own daughter. A number of Jews were condemned to death, two committing suicide. Authorities: Bollandists, Acta, Vol. II, p. 838; Rohrbacher, L' Histoire Universelle de l'Eglise Catholique, Vol. XVIII, pp. 697-700; Thos. Cantipranus, De ratione vitae Vol. II, xxix. The child was canonised as a saint.

1287. Berne. Rudolf, a boy, was murdered at Passover in the house of a rich Jew called Matler. Jews confessed that he had been crucified; many were put to death. The boy was canonised as a martyr, and his name can be found in several martyrologies. Documental authorities: Bollandists, Acta, Vol. II, April; Helvetia sancta (H. Murer); Karl Howald, Die Brunnen zu Bern, 1848, p. 250; Cosm. Aims., 13, p. 482. But a stone monument still exists in Berne commemorating the crime. It is called The Fountain of the Child-Devourer, and is now on the Kornhausplatz. It represents a monster, with a Jewish countenance, eating a child. The figure wears the Judenbut, the hat prescribed for the Jews to wear by decree of the Fourth Lateran Council in 1215. This monument was first placed in a street of the Jews' quarter as a reminder of the monstrous crime and as a punishment for the whole of Berne Jewry. Later, it was removed to its present situation.

1288. Troyes, France. Some Jews were tried for a ritual murder and 13 were executed by burning. Authority: Jewish Encyclopedia, 1906, Vol. XII, p. 267.

1286. Oberwesel, on the Rhine. A boy named Werner was tortured for three days at Passover, hanged by the legs and bled white. The body was found in the river. This boy was beatified in the diocese of Treves, and his anniversary is on 19th April. A sculptured representation of this ritual murder is still to be seen in the Oberwesel Church. Authorities: Aventinus, Annals of Bavaria, 1591, 17, p. 576; Chron. Hirsaug., Magd. Cent., 13, c. 14.

1462. Rinn, Innsbruck. A boy called Andreas Oxner was bought by the Jews and sacrificed for his blood on a stone in the forest. The body was found by his mother in a birch-tree. No Jew was apprehended because, the border being near, they had fled when the crime was made known. The Abbe Vacandard, defender of the Jews, says there was no trial. Well, of course there wasn't. Even in 1937 there is no trial for a crime where the criminals have escaped! The boy has been sanctified by Pope Benedict XIV in his Bull Beatus Andreas, Venice, 1778, which says he was " cruelly assassinated by the Jews in hatred of the faith of Jesus Christ." This last is admitted by Pope Clement XIV, who wrote his report on the investigation he made into the matter of Jewish Ritual Murder when, as Cardinal Ganganelli, he had been commissioned by Pope Benedict XIV to go into the matter; and in this report, he says "I admit the truth of another fact, which happened in the year 1462 in the village of Rinn, in the Diocese of Brixen, in the person of the Blessed Andreas, a boy barbarously murdered by the Jews in hatred of the faith of Jesus Christ." No one questions the historical occurrence or this case. An engraving on wood representing the Ritual Murder still exists in the church.

1468. Sepulveda, Segovia, Spain. The Jews sacrificed a Christian child on a cross. The Bishop of Segovia investigated the crime, and ordered the culprits to Segovia, where they were executed. It is important to know that this Bishop was himself son of a converted Jew; Jean d'Avila was his name. Colmenares's History of Segovia records the facts of the case, which was juridically decided by a man of Jewish blood. That may be the reason that one finds no mention of it in Strack's book in defense of the Jews, The Jew and Human Sacrifice.

1475. The Case of St. Simon of Trent. In 1475, a three-year-old boy named Simon disappeared in the Italian town of Trent; the circumstances were such that suspicion fell upon the Jews. Hoping to averr this suspicion, they themselves "found" the child's body in a conduit where they afterwards confessed to having thrown it. Examination of the body, however, revealed that the boy had not been drowned; there were strange wounds on the body, of circumcision and crucifixion. About seven Jews were arrested; they were tortured and confessed that the boy had been ritually murdered for the purpose of obtaining Christian blood to mix with the ceremonial unleavened bread; these confessions were made separately and agreed in all essential details. The Jews were tried and were ultimately executed. The officer in charge of the investigation of the crime, Jean de Salis de Brescia, had before him a converted Jew, Jean de Feltro, who described how his father told him that Jews of his town, Lanzhat, had killed a child at Passover to get the blood of which they partook in wine and cakes.

No one has ever dared to try and deny the historical events of this case; only the Jews invent "reasons" why it was not Ritual Murder! But there is no escape from the opposite conclusion. In 1759 in answer to a Jewish appeal from Poland, the Inquisition sent Cardinal Ganganelli (later he became Pope Clement XIV) to investigate and report on the whole subject, with particular reference to the many cases then being reported in Poland; although this man went out with a biased mind in favor of the Jews (in his report, he says: "With my weak faculties I endeavored to demonstrate the non-existence of the crime which was imputed to the Jewish nation in Poland," hardly the spirit in which to enter upon such an investigation, he actually says of this Trent case (see Report of Cardinal Ganganelli, in C. Roth's The Ritual Murder Libel and the Jew, 1935, p. 83): "I admit then as true the fact of the Blessed Simon, a boy three years old, killed by the Jews in Trent in the year 1475 in hatred of the faith of Jesus Christ (although it is disputed by Basnage and Wagenseil); for the celebrated Flaminio Cornaro, a Venetian Senator, in his work On the Cult of the Child St. Simon of Trent (Venice, 1753) disposes of all the doubts raised by the above-mentioned critics."

The Jews try to throw discredit on the judges who condemned the Jewish murderers by quoting Pope Sixtus IV who refused to sanction the cult of St. Simon; but the reason for this was that the cult was not then authorized by Rome, but was a popular movement without authority and contrary to Church discipline; this same Pope later expressed his approval of the verdict on the Jews in the Papal Bull XII Kal. July, 1478.

We have not only the testimony as to the correctitude of the proceedings from Sixtus IV; but also that of several other Popes; such as Sixtus V, who regularised the popular cult of St. Simon by ratifying it in 1588, as cited by Benedict XIV in Book I, Ch. xiv, No. 4 of his On the Cononisation of the Saints; also by this same Pope Benedict XIV in his Ball Beatus Andreas of 22nd February, I755, in which he confirms Simon as a saint, a fact omitted from the arguments of that advocate for the Jews, Strack (The Jew and Human Sacrifice); Gregory XIII recognised Simon as a martyr, and even visited the shrine; and, as already stated, Clement XIV was obliged to recognise that it was a case of Jewish murder in hatred of Christianity.

St. Simon's shrine is in the Church of St. Peter, Trent; relics of him are still shown, among them the sacrificial knife.

In short, the Ritual Murder of St. Simon at Trent is supported by such evidence that those who doubt it are thereby condemning without reason high juridical and ecclesiastical authorities whose probity and intelligence there is not the slightest excuse to deny.

1480. Venice. This case, as admitted in the Jewish Encyclopedia, I906, Vol. XII, p. 410, was settled by trial. Three Jews were executed.

1485. Padua, Italy. The victim in this case was canonised as St. Lorenzino, Pope Benedict XIV mentioning him as a martyr in his Bull Beatus Andreas. This case was attested by the Episcopal Court of Padua

1490. Toledo. This is a most important case, the circumstances of which have been clarified for us by W. T. Walsh in his interesting book on Isabella of Spain, 1931 (Sheed & Ward), in which he devotes pp. 441 to 468 to his researches on this Ritual Murder charge. Had it not been for Mr. Walsh, I might have been influenced by the Jewish Encyclopedia's statement (1903, Vol. II1, p. 262) that "Modern historians even deny that a child had disappeared at all" in this case! Strenuous efforts were made by Loeb and H. C. Lea to clear the Jews from guilt of this murder; as also by Abbe Vacandard. Walsh shows that on 17th October, 1490, a Jew named Yuce confessed to having been present at the crucifixion of a boy called Christopher at La Guardian near Toledo. He made this confession without the "aid" of any torture; he was not even threatened with that for one year after his confession. On 19th July, 1491, Yuce was promised immunity from punishment for himself and described the whole crucifixion and gave the names of his accomplices. On 25th October, 1491, a jury of seven noted Renaissance scholars who occupied the Chairs at Salamanca University examined the case and were unanimous in finding Yuce guilty. Not until after this did Yuce undergo torture. This torture was applied to make him say for what reason the boy Christopher had been crucified instead of being killed in any other way; but no "leading" questions were employed in the examination. After this, the case went before a second jury of five learned men of Avila, who considered the evidence concerning Yuce's accomplices, who had been arrested and under examination; they unanimously declared them guilty. Eight Jews (some of them Marranos. or pretended converts to Christianity) were executed.

Writing of the efforts made to discredit the trials in this case, Walsh says (p. 464): "Must we assume that they (the two learned juries) were all murderous fanatics, willing to sacrifice innocent men, and that Dr. Leob, Dr. Lea, and on the Catholic side the somewhat too credulous Abbe Vacandard were better qualified to weigh the evidence after the lapse of four centuries?"

Walsh is not an "anti-semite." He is a historian, and has not suggested that ritual murder is part or any official Jewish ceremony. But he says: "The historian, far from being obliged to make wholesale vindication of all Jews accused of murder, is free, in fact, bound to consider each individual case upon its merits."

Walsh states (p. 441) that this case of Ritual Murder was "one of the chief factors, if not the decisive one, in the decision of Fernando and Isabel" (for the expulsion of the Jews from Spain). He shows that the complete record of testimony in the trial of one of the accused has been available since it was published in 1887 in the Bulletin of the Royal Academy at Madrid (Vol. XI, pp. 7-160), from the original manuscript. (This was, of course, before the Red revolution!)

Walsh charges Lea, the pro-Jewish author, of intellectual dishonesty (p. 628) in writing in his Inquisition in Spain decrying the influential men who were jurors in this case.

"If the Inquisitors sent eight men to a shameful death without being convinced beyond a reasonable doubt of their guilt, the honest verdict of history cannot shrink from finding not only Torquemada and his judges, but King Fernando and Queen Isabel, Cardinal Mendoza and several of the most illustrious professors of Salamanca University guilty of complicity in one of the most brutal judicial murders on record?" (Walsh, p. 442.)

Those who shrink from charging the Jews with the practice of Ritual Murder thereby condemn some of the finest characters on the stage of European history. Note; And side with followers of the Talmud.

Finally, we must record that the murdered boy was canonized as St. Christopher on the authority of Pope Pius VII.

1494. Tyrnau, Hungary. A boy was bled white and killed. The Jew culprits were betrayed by the confession of women, who were persuaded to do so by the sight of some instruments of torture, which however were not applied to them. The Jews, arrested after this confession, themselves confessed that this was the fourth child they had killed for the blood, but they said they wanted this for medical purposes. Authority: Bollandists, Acta, April, Veil. II, 838.


1510. Brandenberg. Several Jews were accused in Berlin of buying a small Christian boy, bleeding him and killing him. They confessed, and 41 were executed Authorities: Richard Mun, Die Juden in Berlin; Sir Richard Burton, The Jew, the Gypsy and El Islam, 1898, p. I26.



CHAPTER IX


WELL AUTHENTICATED CASES IN SEVENTEENTH AND EIGHTEENTH CENTURIES.





NATURALLY, here we get a number of juridically decided cases, as might be expected.

1603. Verona. A Jew was tried on a charge of killing a child to get its blood for an infamous purpose. He was acquitted. The sentence of acquittal, dated 28th February, 1603, given in full in the Jew Roth's The Ritual Murder Libel and the Jew (p. 78), released the accused "because the Hebraic witch abhors the shedding of blood" and "various Princes held this rumor of the use of blood to be vain and false?" We hold that such absurd reasoning as all excuse for acquittal is clear proof that the Court was bought.

1670. Met. As this was a very strongly established case, one does not find any mention of it in Strack's book in defense of the Jews! A three-year-old boy was lost by his mother on the way to a well. The boy was wearing a red cap, and witnesses had seen him carried away by a Jew mounted on a horse. This Jew was Raphael Levi. At first, the boy's body could not be traced. The Jews, becoming frightened, spread the report that wolves must have killed him in the forest. The forest was searched and eventually the head, neck and ribs of a boy were found, together with clothes which were identified as the missing boy's, red cap and all, by the boy's father. But as these clothes were neither torn nor bloody, it was concluded that the wolf story was a "blind," and then witnesses came forward who had seen Raphael Levi with the boy in such places and at such times as to remove all doubt of his guilt. Levi was sentenced to death by the order of the Parliament of Metz, and was burned alive. Authority: La France Juive, by Drumont.

1698. Sandomir, Poland. Authority: The Jew Cecil Roth, in Ritual Murder Libel and the Jew, p. 24. The highest tribunal in the land, that of Lublin, condemned a Jew for Ritual Murder. the local court having exculpated him.

1748. Duniagrod, Poland. Jews condemned for Ritual Murder by Episcopal Court. Mentioned by Roth.

1753. Pavalochi, Poland. Jews condemned for Ritual Murder by Episcopal Court. Mentioned by Roth.

1753. Zhytomir, Poland. In this case, a three-year-old boy was murdered; Jews were tried by the Episcopal Court of Kiev and condemned to death. A painting supposed to commemorate this murder is even now visited by pilgrims to the Carthusian Monastery at Kalwarya near Cracow. Authority: The Jew Cecil Roth, in Ritual Murder Libel and the Jew, p. 25.

Of course, the Jew Roth denies that the cases quoted were Ritual Murders.










stardefinibusterrae (1 secondo fa)


Rimuovi | Spam


@ ComunitaEbraicaRoma - the ignorant think, that: the King of Israel must govern his people: "No! Nothing is further from the truth!" The Jews do not need to be ruled! But few know that: only the King of Israel has the authority to say: "Talmud and Kabbalah: are Satanism: whoever: following these doctrines? Is out of the Kingdom of God!" .. So few people know: that the King of Israel: has fundamentally: an theological task: that is, freeing the Jewish people from its curse: it is: the death instinct: and instinct of self-destruction!








stardefinibusterrae (1 minuto fa)


Rimuovi | Spam


@ComunitaEbraicaRoma - gli ignoranti pensano: che: il Re di Israele deve governare il suo popolo: "no! niente è di più falso!" Gli ebrei non hanno bisogno di essere governati! Ma, pochi sanno che: soltanto il Re di Israele ha la autorità per dire: "talmud e cabbala: sono il satanismo: chiunque: segue queste dottrine? è fuori del Regno di Dio!".. Così pochi sanno: che il Re di Israele ha fondamentalmente compiti teologici: cioè liberare il popolo ebraico dalla sua maledizione: che è: istinto di morte: ed istinto di autodistruzione!






stardefinibusterrae (22 ore fa)


Rimuovi | Spam


Ave Maria, gratia plena,

Dominus tecum,

benedicta tu in mulieribus,

et benedictus fructus ventris tui Iesus.

Sancta Maria mater Dei,

ora pro nobis peccatoribus,

nunc, et in hora mortis nostrae.

Amen






stardefinibusterrae (1 giorno fa)


Rimuovi | Spam


@ComunitaEbraicaRoma -- Maria di Nazareth: la madre di Gesù di Betlemme: è una ragazza ebrea: come tutte! ma, come prima cristiana? Lei è una primizia: di quello, che, ogni cristiano(se ne sarà degno): potrebbe diventare: cioè: essere vero figlio di Dio(per adozione): e non solo: simbolicamente: come gli ebrei: giustamente: attribuiscono a se stessi! per avere ricevuto: in potenza: tutti i cristiani: soltanto: in Cristo: la stessa: Natura Divina di Dio: come: infatti, è già ora vero: per me: in fede! Non esiste: e non è mai esistito: quindi: un culto di adorazione per Maria! Tutte le statue: e le icone: fatte in suo onore? sono soltanto: le fotografie: che ognuno: ha in casa: per onorare la sua mamma! Perché lei è: spiritualmente: la madre e la sorella: di tutti i cristiani! ogni altra affermazione? o illazione? sono solo calunnie!










stardefinibusterrae (3 mesi fa)


Rimuovi | Spam


@ AIPAC -> now? Keep away those that can do the gay, from ​the transmitter: with the trasmitter of the "WIND", for my USB: thanks!

God bless you all, good night!




@ AIPAC -> adesso? tu puoi fare allontare quei gay: che si sono messi a disturbare: il trasmettitore della "WIND", grazie!

Dio vi benedica tutti: buona notte!






stardefinibusterrae (3 mesi fa)


Rimuovi | Spam


@ AIPAC -> then, the God's plan: to see allies: Judaism and Christianity? Of course, not a project today! it went bankrupt: in these 2000 years, only, because of your fathers! How many sufferings could have been avoided? ... sic ... How better could have been, the world today? But, I have news for you: "it does not matter how many horses or dogs: you want to fuck" for profaning all, the whole human race through your control of the media: how, through control: of any other monopoly. but you will not be able to defeat Christianity in this way! you leave Satan, and returns to God, my love: at last!






stardefinibusterrae (3 mesi fa)


Rimuovi | Spam


@ AIPAC -> allora, il progetto di Dio: di vedere alleati: l'ebraismo ed il cristianesimo? Certo, non è un progetto: di oggi! esso, è andato fallito: in questi 2000 anni, unicamente, per colpa dei tuoi padri! Quante sofferenze: si sarebbero potute evitare? ... sic ... Come migliore, avrebbe potuto essere, il mondo, oggi? Ma, io ho una notizia per te: "non ha nessuna importanza, quanti cavalli o cani: tu ti vuoi fottere": profanando tutto il genere umano: attraverso il tuo controllo dei MEDIA: come, attraverso il controllo: di ogni altro monopolio. ma, tu non riuscirai a sconfiggere il cristianesimo: in questo modo! Lascia satana, e torna a Dio: mio amore: finalmente!






stardefinibusterrae (3 mesi fa)


Rimuovi | Spam


@ AIPAC -> [?what is the truth of the story?] You did kill Jesus, then you have killed Stephen and James, etc. .. all for "blasphemy", "apostasy", then what difference there is between you and the Muslims? Only that, you are better educated, but also: 1. most thieves (seigniorage banking), 2. most criminal (murder of Kennedy), and 3. most racist (Talmud): of the Muslims: of course! Then, since in Unius Rei: there is no partiality? Then, like: I have to kill all the Muslims of the Sharia? Then, of course, I must kill, too, all of you! it is because I am a man: mild? So, I do make, at the your WWnuclear 3 °, and then see who the Holy Spirit will do survive in a: hell nuclear inferno! Since die? is much better, which, being on a planet with you!






stardefinibusterrae (3 mesi fa)


Rimuovi | Spam


@AIPAC - [quale è la verità della storia?] Voi avete fatto uccidere Gesù: poi avete ucciso Stefano e Giacomo, ecc.. tutto per "blasfemia"; "apostasia"; che differenza allora, c'è tra voi e i musulmani? Soltanto, che, voi siete più istruiti: ma, anche: 1. più ladri, 2. più criminali; e 3. più razzisti: dei musulmani: ovviamente! Allora, poiché in Unius Rei: non c'è parzialità? Allora, come io devo sterminare tutti i musulmani della Sharia? Poi, certamente io devo sterminare anche tutti voi! è poiché io sono un uomo mite? allora io vi abbandono alla vostra amata 3°WWnuclear, e poi vediamo, chi lo Spirito Santo farà sopravvivere: in quell'inferno nucleare! Poiché morire? è molto meglio che stare in un pianeta insieme a voi!







Other sections on the U.S.:

The cost of Israel - Israel's Effects on U.S. Interests


Jewish power in U.S. politics


Media Power of the Jews in U.S. (and the world)


U.S. and World Business and Finance


When Jews Rule... - The most thorough work to this day on Jewish power and influence in the USA.


Nation of Islam and the Black Resistance